Re: [development] So why we do support postgresql?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Khalid Baheyeldin schrieb:
> On Jan 15, 2008 6:45 PM, Greg Knaddison - GVS <
> Greg@growingventuresolutions.com> wrote:
> 
>> If we want to do this we need more options:
>>
>> On Jan 15, 2008 9:13 PM, Khalid Baheyeldin <kb@2bits.com> wrote:
>>> - MySQL MyISAM
>>> - MySQL InnoDB
>>  - MySQL - Multiple engines
>>> - PostgreSQL
>> - Both MySQL and PostgreSQL
>> - One ore more of the rest MySQL, PostgreSQL, MSSQL, Oracle, DB2
>>
>> But to what end?  If we find out (what we already know) that
>> PostgreSQL is the tiny minority what do we gain?
>>
> 
> Quantifies it.
> 
> Those who want PostgreSQL to continue, either have to put in the effort to
> test things (from your issue) or cough up the money for it.

This discussion is pretty pointless. Dries has stated multiple times
that he wants to increase the number of supported databases. So doing a
Drupal release without full pgsql support is out of the question.

So, I'd like to revert the idea: People who complain about postgres not
been tested and the release being late because of this should set up a
postgres DB and test Drupal on it. Can't be that hard.

Cheers,
	Gerhard
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHjUx2fg6TFvELooQRAttJAJ9Gwv+BnVIBNI+MWO4Qwuq5paFFNgCghPbn
siTKjaCs53HtuSyq1Uxdy0A=
=OmJY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----