Re: [development] has this been discussed here?

Dries Buytaert wrote:

From what I remember, quite a few people didn't care to research the problem before sharing their opinion. Their gut feeling tells them that <!--break--> is semantically better, without knowing what is going on under the hood. As a result, the issue carries quite a number of incorrect assessments and fair amount of personal taste.

I read the issue, and ironically 'gut feeling' and personal taste was the only reason offered for *changing* <!--break--> to something else. I don't care enough about the issue to fight on way or another, but the thread was frustrating to read; a late-in-the-game core patch went up, received NO positive reviews, and several negative ones. It was immediately committed. --Jeff