--- Cog Rusty <cog.rusty@gmail.com> wrote:
Was the Joomla SMF bridge licensed under GPL in the first place? Reading the announcement it seems it was not.
What will licensing bridge under GPL achieve. Wouldn't that pass the buck to bridge ? If bridge is licensed under GPL then connecting bridge (GPL) with SMF ( non-GPL) is same situation whats the difference ? in any case another thread also highlights the discussion between SMF and FSF http://www.simplemachines.org/community/index.php?topic=184557.0 this very questioned has been asked and answered by FSF from that thread
If the glue does have to be GPL (or LGPL), could
the second script be
then legally licensed under a non-compatible license?
No.
____________________________________________________________________________________Ready for the edge of your seat? Check out tonight's top picks on Yahoo! TV. http://tv.yahoo.com/