26 Oct
2006
26 Oct
'06
4:30 a.m.
On Oct 25, 2006, at 7:06 PM, Moshe Weitzman wrote:
Back to the original topic, I recommend that any project description revisions be conducted as informal "reviews" that are posted to the module's issue queue and can then be accepted, rejected, or modified by the maintainer. This preserves the contributors' autonomy while encouraging quality improvements. I do agree that the module descriptions are often of poor quality.
michelle and friends are *volunteering* to *improve our site* with *more accurate project descriptions*. the process above is cumbersome and almost guarantees that almost few descriptions get changed. less friction please.
Seconded. +1 Jonathan