Hi, I recently needed to insert an image from an image field into the node's body prior to rendering. I was able to do this using this code: function THEME_preprocess_field(&$vars) { if ($vars['element']['#object']->type == 'case_study' && $vars['element']['#field_name'] == 'body') { $node = node_load($vars['element']['#object']->nid); $img = field_get_items('node', $node, 'field_cs_image'); $img = field_view_value('node', $node, 'field_cs_image', $img[0], array( 'type' => 'image', 'settings' => array( 'image_style' => 'list_image_large', ) )); $img = render($img); $vars['items'][0]['#markup'] = str_replace('alt=""', 'style="float:right;margin:0 0 20px 20px" alt="' . $node->title . '"', $img) . $vars['items'][0]['#markup']; } } I don't like having to use the str_replace() function to specify attributes for the image but my efforts to use theme('image', ...) and theme('image_style', ...) were unsuccessful because they don't include width and height attributes. I saw the big thread with Dave Reid on the performance issue with getsize(). I understand the reasoning for removing the function but how is it that rendering the image with field_view_value() produces an image tag with width and height attributes? Couldn't the theme functions use the same method? Is there a better or more proper way to render an image with width and height attributes AND specify other attributes such as alt and style? Thanks, Cameron