-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 mark burdett schrieb:
I don't know what it means if SFLC conflicts with FSF on this issue :) But just wanted to point out SFLC's legal theory that the GPL civicrm module could call the CiviCRM API, even though the civicrm API files themselves are AGPL..
Yeah, I know this theory and I used to think it is correct. Based on this theory I recommended to Donald Lobo that the civicrm module itself be dually licensed, to which he agreed. I am personally not too happy with the "new" situation. However, we need to resolve it. Cheers, Gerhard -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFG5P3Hfg6TFvELooQRAmZSAJ9mOCLud9DxaRxpipNYYs8LVN2gjQCfd2UH yMcSlVv4r0kTwEnldrAgYdU= =7PH1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----