On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 17:44:52 +0100, Kieran Lal <kieran@civicspacelabs.org> wrote:
On Dec 1, 2005, at 8:05 AM, Andre Molnar wrote:
Kieran Lal wrote:
On Dec 1, 2005, at 7:40 AM, andre wrote:
Notwithstanding the 'potential' problems with sending xhtml as text/html - see: http://www.hixie.ch/advocacy/xhtml (or google for similar documents) - the idea is to encourage the creation of valid markup - and have all markup passed through a validator first (which eliminates the 'real' problems).
On that note - it might be a good idea to include links to pages like: http://www.hixie.ch/advocacy/xhtml part of the best practices documentation.
Can we resolve these issues and make solid recommendations I can include in the documentation?
IMHO the solid recommendation is -
Make sure to include a doc type declaration in your theme.
Can you give a basic explanation of doc types, with appropriate link, and where this is defined in the theme?
http://www.htmlhelp.org/tools/validator/doctype.html and http://www.w3.org/QA/2002/04/valid-dtd-list.html should help. [...]
Include links to http://www.w3.org/QA/Tools/#validators and optionally information about XHTML so theme developers can make an informed decision when choosing their doc type.
I have these two. I think that is enough. What do you think? # Before you start modifying your CSS to fix your bugs it is important to ensure you are styling valid HTML or XHTML. There is a web validator is built into the Firefox Web Developer toolbar.
Opera also has validation built in without needing an extension. Just press Ctrl+Alt+V. -- Tim Altman