What I'm thinking is probably more along the lines of a new hook, rather than theming. So, we'd have hook_block_links (or extend hook_links to have a binary block parameter), which would allow all modules to add links to specific blocks. Then, those links would be passed to theme_links, which would do its work. I think this is more than a CSS issue, as most links should be wrapped in some block level element. Weblink.module is currently inserting its own HTML to do this.
-1 on this.. We output a unique id for each block, which helps us to theme the various blocks in a unique way..
Fair enough, but there's no clean way for a module to output links specifically for a block. And, AFAICT, any links that are output now are stuck in module-specific markup. Isn't consistency a good thing?
Is it cleaner to -------------------------------------------------------8<------------ if (enabled(comment module)) { add comment links } -------------------------------------------------------8<------------ in a module OR -------------------------------------------------------8<------------ $output .= call_hook("add block links", "blockname", "block delta"); -------------------------------------------------------8<------------ in that module and -------------------------------------------------------8<------------ function comment_add block links($name, $delta) { if (this_block_needs_to_have_comment_links($name, $delta)) { return comment links } } -------------------------------------------------------8<------------ in the comment module? Now the modules know what their blocks should contain, and on what else they depend on. Now you say it would be better if comment module would know what else depends on it (even contrib modules?). I doubt it. Goba