On Friday 23 September 2005 15:07, Dries Buytaert wrote:
Care to explain why it wouldn't solve anything? IMO, having a more desprective module name does make a difference for new users.
Book module does what its name suggests: it allows you to chapterise (is that a word?) a long set of articles. It /can/ be used as outliner. Somehow but it certainly IS not an outliner. And I keep on chanting my mantra: "it is not about the name, it is about what the interface and system communicates to the users" Hell, I as a Dutchy would think funny things are happening at flickr. I would have no idea what delicious is about (cake, recepies, h0t Ch1xx). nor what an orkut is. And what does the name RSS/RDF learn me? Nothing. Yet everyone seems to know what its about. The /name/ is but a small, if not tiny, part of the whole communication. Simply changing the name will make hardly any difference. For example: did we see a decrease in the amout of rants about taxonomy being so hard now that it is called classification? I certainly see no less confused people in this area. Greets, Bèr 'calling your bike a Mercedes does not make it a car' Kessels