On Monday 18 September 2006 11:14 am, Augustin (Beginner) wrote:
--------------------------------------------- | For the week | For the day | | rank - % | rank - % | --------------------------------------------| cpu | 86th - 0.216% | 190th - 0.107% | hit | 504th - 0.032% | 543th - 0.030% | Bandwidth | 404th - 0.045% | 370th - 0.030% | ---------------------------------------------
See the high cpu usage compared to hits and bandwidth. The relatively lower cpu rank for the day is only due to a server upgrade which rendered spamming impossible. Now, I have already noted a few weeks ago that the cpu usage of a Drupal site is higher than the cpu usage of other sites. Another Drupal site I have and which has never used the trackback module (and therefore never been entered in the spammers' registry) is showing the same pattern of a higher cpu usage. However, it is not as bad as this site.
As promissed, here is an update on the cpu usage, more than a week after applying the fix (in .htaccess): --------------------------------------------- | For the week | For the day | | rank - % | rank - % | --------------------------------------------| cpu | 337th - 0.059% | 697th - 0.021% | hit | 708th - 0.021% | 857th - 0.016% | Bandwidth | 692th - 0.024% | 840th - 0.017% | --------------------------------------------- So, Drupal is still using much more CPU than other applications hosted at the same place, but the discrepancy between cpu and hit/bandwidth is not as bad as when I was spammed for trackbacks. Augustin. -- http://www.wechange.org/ Because we and the world need to change. http://www.reuniting.info/ Intimate Relationships, peace and harmony in the couple.