Hi Bèr! I took a look at your code right now. shazamgallery really does many things I want/need and I'll be happy to help you with bug fixes and all. But what gets to me is the 'term' thing. :-) I still don't know if creating a term for each album is better than creating a parent node and its children. When the new image module was released, I thought of installing taxonomy_otf and allowing users to create their own galleries using terms. But then I got afraid I would have too many terms -- 300, 500, etc. I'd rather have 500 nodes than terms. Maybe it's something in my mind only, kind of the way I organize my ideas, but I think I like the node idea better. (I know that shazamgallery is much more than simply merging image and taxonomy_otf modules). Anyway, this is a sincere invitation to discuss what direction to follow. ;-) Cheers, Emiliano. On Tuesday 23 August 2005 12:53, Bèr Kessels wrote:
Did you have a look at shazamgallery? Itr already dos quite a lot you want, yet it needs love and attention, in order to grow into a mature, wellrunning gallery. I would love to welcome some more maintainers for this module, for I am often too busy to maintain bugs and issues.
Ber