10 Jan
2006
10 Jan
'06
6:25 p.m.
But it still isn't going to give you the snappy response that you'd get from a drupal page that has been cached as a static html page. A program like jpcache (http://www.jpcache.com/), would be a bit slower than a static page because apache would have to load php, and then load the cached file (from a file or db), however it would still use a fraction of the resources that a drupal site would.
I fail to see the advantage of using jpcache over writing static files. Care to elaborate? -- Dries Buytaert :: http://www.buytaert.net/