3 May
2006
3 May
'06
5:16 a.m.
On May 2, 2006, at 8:05 PM, Khalid B wrote:
In another thread Derek asked why core has modules at all.
that wasn't me. i believe you're thinking of jeff eaton. i think drupal's "core" should contain some modules, even ones beyond the required 4 or 5. but, i'm in support of reducing the # of modules in core, and distributing the work of maintaining modules that are important, but not necessarily "core".
This has the benefit of slimming core even more and making it more into framework/API than a "blogging package" or "CMS package".
agreed. some things in core clearly don't need to be there, and contribute to drupal's (undeserved but understandable) reputation as "just a blogging package". -derek