Here is the list for discussion. 1) Overhead of innodb and need for CMS. 2) Spend some time looking at our database scheme and/or slow query log. If so, they must take into account the fact that we aim for ANSI MySQL compliance; MySQL-isms are not an option. 3) Better error handling for Innodb. 4) Replication topologies to support higher posting volumes. I'll pass the list on and find out what their teams availability is. Cheers, Kieran On Aug 24, 2005, at 11:47 PM, Dries Buytaert wrote:
On 24 Aug 2005, at 22:55, Khalid B wrote:
- How much performance degradation does InnoDB introduce? We all know InnoDB is good for referential integrity, transactions, ...etc. but it does increase overhead. How much of that is expected for a CMS type application.
This would be my main question too.
Furthermore, I wonder if someone of the MySQL team could spend some time looking at our database scheme and/or slow query log. If so, they must take into account the fact that we aim for ANSI MySQL compliance; MySQL-isms are not an option.
-- Dries Buytaert :: http://www.buytaert.net/