Project: Drupal Version: 4.5.0 Component: user.module Category: bug reports Priority: critical Assigned to: javanaut Reported by: javanaut Updated by: Dries Status: patch Fine with me. Dries Previous comments: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ February 3, 2005 - 23:32 : javanaut Attachment: http://drupal.org/files/issues/user_access_bug.patch (473 bytes) The user_access function in user.module returns the results of the *strstr()* function, which returns a string, not a Boolean like the documentation suggests. This was screwing things up for me since flexinode relies on user_access for it's node_access('create'..) functionality. The attached patch uses strpos instead of strstr. It was created from a 4.5 codebase, but I noticed that the same issue is in HEAD as well. I'm using it on my dev site, and node_access('create'..) calls are now working properly and nothing I'm using seems to have any problems with it. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ February 4, 2005 - 01:20 : Anonymous + return strpos($perm[$account->uid], "$string, ") !== FALSE ? TRUE : FALSE; could be written more simply as + return strpos($perm[$account->uid], "$string, ") !== FALSE; Keep in mind it's also possible to type-cast the result of strstr to a boolean value (i.e. return (bool) strstr($perm[$account->uid], "$string, ");)... I am unsure as to whether strstr or strpos would be faster... perhaps a quick benchmark could answer the question of which we should use. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ February 4, 2005 - 03:24 : javanaut Heh, after posting that, I realized what I had done, but never got back around to simplifying it. Good eye. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ February 4, 2005 - 07:25 : tangent The PHP docs claim that strpos is faster and less memory intensive than strstr. For what it's worth, the second statement below does not seem more simple or readable than the first to me though it's hard to say if casting an int as a boolean is more or less performant than performing a logical comparison. return strpos($perm[$account->uid], "$string, ") !== FALSE ? TRUE : FALSE; return (bool) strpos($perm[$account->uid], "$string, ") !== FALSE; ------------------------------------------------------------------------ February 4, 2005 - 16:25 : javanaut The security flaw that this fixes is where strstr finds too man positive results. Example: module A has permission "type A create content" (Allowed for role) module B has permission "create content" (Disallowed for role) user_access("create content") is run for module B and returns non-FALSE, non-null results, even though the role is disallowed. Avoiding this would require a permission naming convention such that no permission were a substring of another. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ February 4, 2005 - 16:37 : tangent Permissions are comma delimited aren't they? The comma space in the string would handle this IIRC. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ February 4, 2005 - 16:57 : javanaut In this example, the search string passed to strstr becomes: "*create content, *" The main list of permissions being searched would contain the string: "type A *create content, *" ..which would match. This problem may not be resolved by this fix, btw. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ February 4, 2005 - 18:32 : tangent While a regular expression would resolve this symptom, this example demonstrates that using only strings to identify permissions is not very robust. Is there a reason (performance would be a good one but only so far) that permissions aren't stored with an index? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ February 6, 2005 - 12:18 : Dries Would it be possible to implode() the permissions string and to use in_array() ? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ February 6, 2005 - 13:11 : Anonymous Dries: Possible, but not desirable. in_array is a rather slow function. I'd rather put the permissions as keys of an array $perm and use isset($perm['do something']). We should then probably store serialized arrays in the table. That is ok, because the table is a sort of cache. Gerhard -- View: http://drupal.org/node/16705 Edit: http://drupal.org/project/comments/add/16705