Issue status update for http://drupal.org/node/27980 Post a follow up: http://drupal.org/project/comments/add/27980 Project: Drupal Version: cvs Component: base system Category: tasks Priority: normal Assigned to: drumm Reported by: drumm Updated by: moshe weitzman -Status: patch (code needs review) +Status: patch (ready to be committed) ok, this patch makes sense now. this is simply unused code. moshe weitzman Previous comments: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mon, 01 Aug 2005 20:18:04 +0000 : drumm This themeable function is not used in core. It is used once in contrib. The author of that module is okay with removing it. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mon, 01 Aug 2005 22:25:10 +0000 : Jeremy@kerneltrap.org The idea is to make it available for use in themes, modules, etc, to design custom pagers. Why exactly do you need to remove it? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Tue, 02 Aug 2005 03:07:38 +0000 : moshe weitzman i agree with jeremy. can't we find more meaningful patches than ones which strip themeability. I can't evaluate the patch because I don't see a file. maybe thats a bug, or drumm just forgot. not everyone uses our google ripoff pager. i have customized this in the past for clients. you can't look at contributed themes and then conclude that a theme function is not used. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Tue, 02 Aug 2005 11:24:01 +0000 : Bèr Kessels another -1. This theme function was added to allow better themeing of teh pager. Before this function we could only go for the standard pager, now we can theme it much nicer. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Tue, 02 Aug 2005 17:44:27 +0000 : drumm Attachment: http://drupal.org/files/issues/pager.inc.diff (1.43 KB) Not sure what happened with the patch file. This is code that isn't used anywhere but is loaded for every page view anyway. It could live in contrib or in some documentation instead. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Wed, 03 Aug 2005 16:11:01 +0000 : Dries I'm with Neil here. This function is not called anywhere, hence it is dead code -- at least for core and contrib. If you need this function, you can still implement it elsewhere (eg. in your theme).