On 9/18/06, Khalid B <kb@2bits.com> wrote:
It just means "the next release" with a fixed point of reference in time that everyone can tie into ...
Much as I agree on this - doesn't it really boil down to Dries' personal preference? Someone else could announce a name and we could all start using it. Until Dries likes it, though, it isn't really official though, right? I feel like there are plenty of arguments in favor of this, and one important one in opposition: http://lists.drupal.org/pipermail/development/2006-May/015505.html +++++++++++++++++++ On 30 Apr 2006, at 19:54, Larry Garfield wrote:
As for codenames, the 4.7/5.0 question is why they exist. :-) I'm game.
How about we call it 'development version'? That is by far the most accessible term for outsiders. Think about it. Code names are a developer-ism. +++++++++++++++++++ Unconed - I pasted that here for you in you offline mode - enjoy! Greg -- Greg Knaddison | Growing Venture Solutions Denver, CO | http://growingventuresolutions.com Technology Solutions for Communities, Individuals, and Small Businesses