On Dec 11, 2007, at 1:39 AM, adrian rossouw wrote:
Perhaps we should also put together guidelines for doing a security review / code style check (maybe with the assistance of coder.module), to help us boost the quality of the contribs repository.
Agreed. Oh, and a patch against coder.module so that it generated a patch that corrected, not just a report about, all violations it knows how to fix: http://drupal.org/node/159364
We could also flag modules that need documentation somehow.
Lovely idea. See http://drupal.org/node/161085 for suggested documentation standards/practices for d.o projects. On Dec 11, 2007, at 1:36 AM, adrian rossouw wrote:
perhaps check for some other simple modules that haven't been ported to 6 yet ? cross reference something like LOC (not really a good indicator, but still) versus their positions in the d.o usage stats.
Another lovely idea! Adrian, you rock. ;) Thanks, -Derek (dww)