On May 15, 2006, at 8:26 PM, James Walker wrote:
On 15-May-06, at 8:30 PM, Karthik wrote:
Premium modules are those that are:
a) release-critical - A new version of Drupal cannot be released unless these are up-to-date. b) quality controlled - these will be 'core modules' in all but name. c) well maintained - HEAD, current release and previous release should all be maintained preferably by a number of maintainers.
How do we keep track of which these are? Who decides? trackback, e.g. is afaik currently unmaintained... etc.
I do, however, think that somehow giving folks an idea of which modules are worth trying before others is a good one. But this sounds like a sticky situation at best... tread lightly.
I am more interested in application-specific Drupal bundles and bundle maintainers. For example, we could have a forum-centric bundle, a blog-centric bundle, and a brochure-ware bundle. But bundles could easily become forks, in which I am not interested.