Hi, I know that you want the sandbox accounts to say the way they are, and you are willing to pay to get this. Do not pay for this, I am willing to set up a cvs hosting with my host company, and provide this service to anyone that wants it. I have Gb of space that can be allocated, and TB of bandwidth that can be donated to this. I can hand out most likely more that enough user accounts. I think this is a bad change/enforcement of the policy for sandboxes, and that the current system is a very valuable resource. I know that the sandboxes are no longer really used for their original purpose, but their use to a great help to development and share early code. 1 idea I did have is to move the sandbox to a 3rd repository, and we will not have the chaos of the sandboxes in the contrib repos. Gordon. Karoly Negyesi wrote:
----- Start Original Message ----- Sent: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 15:44:46 +0100 From: Gerhard Killesreiter <gerhard@killesreiter.de> To: development@drupal.org Subject: Re: [development] Seems I need to take sandbox in my own hands
Karoly Negyesi wrote:
Hi,
If this sandbox rule is not changed really soon then I will simply open The rules haven't changed, they are only enforced. The only inconvenience to users is that they'll need to tell us to re-enable their access in case they were using the sandbox for core development. These are only very few people, unfortunatly.
Stop acting silly.
I can not take an oath that every code I commit to my sandbox is intended for core. Some of the examples I mentioned -- JonBob's node access modules, our memcached session work -- definitely was and will not be for core.
Further research shows that http://www.csoft.net/budget-vhost.html has unlimited CVS/SVN sub accounts for 15 bucks per month. This is even better. I will open the account on Monday or Tuesday.
Regards
NK
!DSPAM:1000,45840d95166526732721593!