-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Daniel F. Kudwien schrieb:
I don't think you are making much sense here. You claim that module developers haven't found time to add the new D6 features in their code and at the same time want to have a D7 which is more mature (and presumably thus contains even more features).
In the end your proposal would only serve to disconnect core and contrib even more.
Cheers, Ger»release early, release often«hard
In case this really was ambigious:
Let it [D6] mature.
=> i.e. defer the code freeze for D7.
Obviously, I mean the exact opposite of what you understood. Contrib needs time to catch up with core.
Ah, that makes much more sense, although I still disagree. If a module author hasn't found the time to include D6 features over one year after D6 was released, he'll not find time regardless of when D7 is released. If, however, D7 was released in June, he'd look at his code again at least in July and maybe kick out some D5 leftovers. Cheers, Gerhard -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAknshAwACgkQfg6TFvELooQUXwCgwKKCLDzJJAW/GapYvVMDMRrr XnAAoJBa2oCwisnKX0sNSJFjVSCBRHMw =G4Z8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----