5 Aug
2006
5 Aug
'06
4:45 a.m.
On Aug 4, 2006, at 8:33 PM, Khalid B wrote:
I agree with Morbus on this .... (mark the day ...)
For this very reason:
Doing so, even internally, is a creation of what appears to be a new protocol, even though it's actually not.
A new "file" format is more acceptable ...
Can you elaborate? What do you mean by a new "file" format? Sorry for my ignorance about URNs. Btw, were you agreeing about using internal:node/4, or just about *not* using internal://node/4? Ray