10 Mar
2008
10 Mar
'08
5:21 p.m.
Jakob Petsovits wrote:
So the release system expects all releases of a major release (2.x) to be similarly stable and recommended, which is wrong in this case (and others as well, probably - including Views, which also does betas and release candidates for point releases).
Yes, technically this is wrong from what dww intended to set up. However, the decision not to allow modules a Z number in the release system (x.y.Z) left us in the annoying position that the major number can ramp up *very* quickly...which means *branch maintenance* can ramp up *very* quickly. I wanted Views 2 to actually be 2; had I done this by the rules, Views 2 would actually be Views 6 or something, and that fails to fit my vision.