On Saturday 12 February 2005 23:09, K B wrote:
So what is the point of Scott and Goba (as examples, not to pick on anyone), fixing something in 4.5?
I fixed the 4.5 branch rather than HEAD because, at present, I'm using a mix of 4.4 and 4.5 on my sites, and I'm developing for 4.5 at work. I know 4.6 is soon to be released, but my production sites won't upgrade immediately and will stay with 4.5 for a month or two. I don't yet have a HEAD test site running to play with, and don't have time right now to create it. (I know you weren't intending to pick on me, K.B., but you asked a reasonable question and I felt it deserved an answer.) Sorry my question stirred up this hornet's nest. I wasn't aware that the release process for a contributed module was that complicated, and I just assumed that I had done something wrong in my CVS commit. I didn't know that "project" was a downstream gatekeeper as well. Now I do, so no problem. :-) Scott -- -----------------------+------------------------------------------------------ Scott Courtney | "I don't mind Microsoft making money. I mind them scott@4th.com | having a bad operating system." -- Linus Torvalds http://4th.com/ | ("The Rebel Code," NY Times, 21 February 1999) | PGP Public Key at http://4th.com/keys/scott.pubkey