+1 from me. Jeff Eaton wrote:
I think it's exactly what a lot of people have been asking for in image.module for a long time -- definitely more useful for the majority of people than the gallery function. Like uploading, it can be turned off on a nodetype by nodetype basis, so nothing is *forced* on users, neh?
I'm curious whether it could be used by a module I'm working on -- a 'graphic novel' nodetype that would have 2 explicitly named images associated with it (one for the left page and one for the right page of a two-page spread).
--Jeff
-----Original Message----- *From:* James Gilliland [mailto:neclimdul@gmail.com] *Sent:* Sunday, April 02, 2006 12:36 PM *To:* development@drupal.org *Subject:* Re: [development] nodeapi image concept (request for feedback)
I'd like to see it there
On 4/2/06, *James Walker* <walkah@walkah.net <mailto:walkah@walkah.net>> wrote:
On 31-Mar-06, at 5:25 PM, Nedjo Rogers wrote:
> There's an issue on the image module for moving to nodeapi: > > http://drupal.org/node/43628
Yeah, after looking through the code, I'm inclined to say this makes sense directly in image.module . Do others have a strong opinion?
-- James Walker :: http://walkah.net/ :: xmpp:walkah@walkah.net <mailto:xmpp:walkah@walkah.net>