30 May
2008
30 May
'08
4:42 p.m.
On 30 May 2008, at 4:35 PM, Darrel O'Pry wrote:
<constructive criticism>The -dev extra is still a little limiting. a timestamp would almost be better. I personally feel users who want to follow head will be using CVS, and those who don't knwo how to use CVS but want to test are using -dev.tar.gz. A timestamp would be a solid indicator as to which -dev release they're using since it is a moving target.</contructive criticism>
i'm sitting in the same situation right now. I would like to create weekly releases from HEAD on a project i am working on right now. -dev has too many semantics related to it for my purposes.