21 May
2007
21 May
'07
4:40 p.m.
1) You're still on D5. 2) It's not yet in D6. You're right that it would produce less distinct files. But not everybody will have it enabled, and thus you should still only add your JS when it's necessary. Wim On May 21, 2007, at 16:33 , Fernando Silva wrote:
But if we use the "next to come..." Javascript aggregator feature, wouldn't it make less and smaller files?
On 5/21/07, Bèr Kessels <ber@webschuur.com> wrote:
Op maandag 21 mei 2007, schreef Wim Leers:
Option #3 is the best one, if the situation permits it.
One important reason for this, is, that this way you won't present your users with tons of JS that you only use in the backend. JAvascript that they will never use anyway.