--- Cog Rusty <cog.rusty@gmail.com> wrote:
You cant be more wrong ;) take a look at http://drupal.org/project/smfforum , this is in violation of GPL as per this latest discussion. And its hosted on drupal. The module make direct calls do SMF API ( a non-GPL compliant ) product.
At last! Now we are talking. Wouldn't someone have to challenge the conformance or the module with a particular article of its attached license to claim such a thing?
As a side-issue, there is also the question of "legitimate interest" of the one who does challenge it. Doesn't the requirement of legitimate interest exist in most countries? (IANAL either).
Its not so much as question of challenging it. The fact is that module clearly is in violation of GPL and still hosted on Drupal. So question is whats Drupal's policy ? Still continue to say that d.o. is fully compliant or d.o. doesn't care ? If we go by your logic then everyone will just use GPL software and release their own modules as proprietary license under the concept of "legitimate interest". After all everyone has "legitimate interest" to not release their own contributions as GPL ;) ____________________________________________________________________________________Ready for the edge of your seat? Check out tonight's top picks on Yahoo! TV. http://tv.yahoo.com/