20 Jan
2005
20 Jan
'05
3:19 p.m.
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:15:33 -0500 Morbus Iff <morbus@disobey.com> wrote:
Out of curiousity, does this suggest that you're currently having a lot of spam slip through the filter?
Of late, I've only had two slip by. Most of the unexpected spam is caught in the "no more than 3 URLs per message" filter.
Which makes me wonder: what problem are we solving by adding the additional complexity of shared databases? In any case, I'd only recommend sharing URLfilter data, and possibly custom filter data. I wouldn't recommend trying to syncronize the Bayesian data. -Jeremy