On Wed, 11 May 2005 21:54:22 +0200, K B <kbahey@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/10/05, Jeremy Epstein <jazepstein@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/10/05, Karoly Negyesi <karoly@negyesi.net> wrote:
If you are doing this, then lose drupal from path, like this:
public_html/.htaccess.example public_html/index.php public_html/core public_html/local
Now that you do it like that, I agree that having 'drupal/' is just one more unnecessary path depth. The way you did it above looks good to me.
I'm a bit concerned about renaming 'core' to 'drupal' - might be confusing (or even technically problematic) since 'drupal' is also the name of the core CVS repository? We would end up with the path '/cvs/drupal/drupal/[subdirs]'. The ViewCVS address is already http://cvs.drupal.org/viewcvs/drupal/drupal/. Do you want to add a third 'drupal' to this path? I sure don't.
All this does not need to go in CVS as it is. The CVS can largely remain as it is. What the developers see when committing code and what the end user (site admin) sees are two different things.
I usually do CVS checkouts rather than download tarballs. I won't be able to take advantage of this new setup as easily if CVS isn't updated. Please update CVS as well. -- Tim Altman