18 Aug
2005
18 Aug
'05
7:09 p.m.
Maybe I think too corporately, but before I gave away the copyright to my code I'd need a perpetual license to use the code as I see fit. As you say, copyright isn't licensing and I can easily see cases where a client would want something similar but proprietary. That's the only objection I have. On 8/18/05, Boris Mann <borismann@gmail.com> wrote:
I just want to point out that this is a very common thing. If the copyright is not assigned to a single entity (remember, copyright =! licensing, which is still GPL), then it becomes very difficult to take legal action.