On 9-Jun-07, at 1:36 PM, Doug Green wrote:
Angie,
Why is version_control preferred over versioncontrol?
For legibility. It's consistent with our variable naming convention, and separating the individual words help non-English speakers who can babelfish individual words to figure out what a particular thing is doing.
I thought we only used the underscores when the module was extending another module. And I thought we had problems with hook functions related to underscores, or is the problem only related to hook's with underscores?
I know of no such problems. The only thing I can think that would cause a problem is if you named a function something like my_module_insert and Drupal mistook it for a node insert hook when it was just a helper function or something. But mymodule_insert would have exactly the same problem.
-----Original Message----- From: development-bounces@drupal.org [mailto:development- bounces@drupal.org] On Behalf Of Angela Byron Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 12:37 PM To: development@drupal.org Subject: Re: [development] Naming the CVS abstraction module
What do you think would be the best name for this module?
Just want to chime in as the Coding Standards Queen, that a name such as version_control.module would be preferred over versioncontrol.module. :)
Jakob, once you get the list of possible names down to 2 or 3, you might want to post a poll to the SoC group and cross-post here to get a definitive consensus. :)
-Angie