Another issue I've noticed, is users contributing what amounts to site specific modules, that duplicate another module with small differences, such as would be specific to only a single site. The motive for this seems to be either clients, development companies, or individuals who are seeking credit or trying to improve appearances by having contributed modules in their name. Now for my speculation on the issue, this may be due to the general attitude in the Drupal community that the way to evaluate a members skill, or value, is by CVS commit logs, or core patches submitted. While this is a good way to evaluate, it may be the value placed on such a metric, that causes people to strive to find a way to be visible, without considering quality or consequences to new users in terms of duplicated modules. I for one, know that I have had multiple employers look at my d.o account and cvs log, yet I know that at least one of them did not ever read the code associated with it. I don't know what the real solution to this problem is, but I know that I am guilty of striving to have something committed in CVS, without regard to quality, commitment to maintain it, or overall quality. -Mike __________________ Michael Prasuhn mike@mikeyp.net http://mikeyp.net 503.488.5433 714.356.0168 cell 949.200.7670 fax