Hi there, On 8/5/06, Morbus Iff <morbus@disobey.com> wrote:
[...] Actually, for what it's worth, we should NOT use internal:// or *any* foo:// patterns. Doing so, even internally, is a creation of what appears to be a new protocol, even though it's actually not. We should instead create a new URN, such as internal:node/4. Apple, in the past two years or so, I think, got flamed for using webcal:// for it's iCal application, where webcal was merely a file format, and not a protocol.
I agree. I would propose to use some wiki convention, like wikipedia's [[node label | internal:node/1]]. By the way, although I am listening since some time, this is the first message I post. I am using Drupal for a web site about a conference (http://www.pi.infn.it/congressi/tau06/). I did some php coding for it, a theme and something that could become a conference module. In that web site I use the wiki module, where one can use [label | http:?q=node] for internal links. This would break if Drupal changes the ?q= notation. Greetings, -- Alberto