On Sunday, 1. June 2008, Jakob Petsovits wrote:
On Saturday, 31. May 2008, Earl Miles wrote:
I just grepped and looked at 43 instances of switch() in Views 1.
I find one case that might look like a missing break in the theme wizard; and it's kind of odd. Otherwise, nada. Waste of my time.
Views 2. Ok, let me see if I can dig this up again... don't know anymore where I found it, but perhaps it's still in there somewhere.
Ok, found it, and it seems that it's indeed intended (for reference, 'style_options' vs. 'row_options'). So shame on me and further reinforcing the notion that I should not be granted commit access to Views. Putting a // fall through comment instead of the break; might help avoiding stupid monkeys like me, though. Sorry for wasting your time; friends?, Jakob