24 Jan
2007
24 Jan
'07
8:03 p.m.
adrian rossouw wrote:
On 24 Jan 2007, at 7:49 PM, Michael Favia wrote:
I honestly had the same concern as you with regards to landing in a new module and getting your feet wet quickly. With my passing understanding of the proposal there doesnt actually seem to be a reason not to follow a standard naming convention anyway is there?
If you don't follow the standard naming scheme, you would have to add an entry for that hook in your _registry hook. Whereas it could be automatically detected otherwise.
Meaning by not following the standard you are actually making more work for yourself.
Is there any reason to allow non-standard entries in the first place? Cheers, Gerhard