Op 25-mrt-05 om 12:15 heeft Tim Altman het volgende geschreven:
I've been looking into the image.inc code and I'm unhappy with the amount of gd2-specific code in that file. The logic in many of the functions has special cases for gd2 that would be unnecessary if gd2 were another external toolkit, rather than integrated with image.inc. Couldn't we distribute Drupal with image.inc and image.gd2.inc? I think that would make all the image code simpler, more readable, and more maintainable. Tim,
I'm not sure what you mean.. We already ship drupal with a image.inc, which standard uses GD 2. If you want the image_gd2_*() functions to be extracted from the standard image.inc, I have to disappoint you.. That's not gonna happen.. But, if you want to use other toolkits than GD 2, you are free to use any of these: ImageMagick: http://cvs.drupal.org/viewcvs/drupal/contributions/modules/image/ image.imagemagick.inc IMagick: http://cvs.drupal.org/viewcvs/drupal/contributions/sandbox/gordon/ image.imagick.inc IMLib: http://cvs.drupal.org/viewcvs/drupal/contributions/sandbox/gordon/ image.imlib.inc GD 1: http://cvs.drupal.org/viewcvs/drupal/contributions/sandbox/stefan/ image.gd1.inc If I understood you wrong, please send an e-mail again or contact me in private.. Stefan.