18 Feb
2008
18 Feb
'08
5:49 p.m.
Ashraf Amayreh wrote:
Sometime I think this should become a requirement rather than something optional, all current dev releases could be promoted to a first release and new dev releases banned.
No, because during active development it is really convenient to have the -dev releases available. I agree that it is inconvenient that sloppy module maintainers do not create releases. However, this is my philosophy: If the maintainer of the module is sloppy enough as to not be able to provide proper releases, despite the existence of a good release mechanism, then I have little reason to trust that module developer's code. i.e, I think people simply should not use these modules.