9 Aug
2008
9 Aug
'08
4:21 p.m.
On 09 Aug 2008, at 4:09 PM, Zohar Stolar wrote:
As yhager proposed, having two DBs instead of one, may ease things a lot. One DB will hold content: nodes, revisions, files, users... The second DB will hold configuration: views, cck structure, modules, variables... (this list is highly debatable).
Prefixing would work just as well for this. I was thinking of adding properties to the table definition in schema, myself. IE: content / configuration.