Steven schreef:
"2. 'add' and 'check' are slightly inconsistent. Elsewhere we have 'add foo' and 'check foo'."
Hmm, you're right that we had "add foo" in most places, but then we /don't/ have "view node" and "edit node", but "view" and "edit". What is the reasoning behind this? In this case, each operation applies to the noun in the parent tab ('access rule'). A while ago Stefan made a large patch to further remove nouns in local tasks when their meaning could be inferred (and even in cases where this was less so, like the filter admin). This patch was committed.
The thought behind the 'edit', 'view', 'details', etc operations are single words is to have the table sizes at a minimum width so, these could be viewed within a 640x480 screen without having a horizontal scrollbar. For titles imo we should have decent and clear titles on what we could do.. For menu items, we should have titles which are not wrapped inside more than 1 rule - according to a normal font-size - width a max width of 180 or 190 px. Tabs should have - accordingly to the page titles - clear and decent titles either... Unfortunatly, i'm not quite sure what you mean with: "In this case, each operation applies to the noun in the parent tab ('access rule')." Steef