4 Sep
2008
4 Sep
'08
6:10 a.m.
On Sep 3, 2008, at 8:56 PM, Earl Miles wrote:
BTW thanks for publicly assuming that I went through all this effort to be annoying.
I think the intention of his question wasn't "you're just being annoying" but rather, "you must have thought of this -- so can you explain why it can't just be backwards compatible?". Cheers, -Derek (dww)