Dries Buytaert wrote:
The answers to all (y)our questions can be solved by a simple cardsort experiment. We have the categories (block titles), the top-level links and their descriptions. All we need to do is organize a cardsort experiment, invite all our users to take part, and we're done. :)
This is the first statement I've seen here that actually resembles a scientific approach. My 2 cents as someone just learning the Drupal code base but who knows a fair bit about quality: Usability isn't found through abstract arguments, and it especially isn't found by text-based email debates without rigorous models or inline examples. It's found, often iteratively, by the combination of empirical data and theoretical models. So if you want to do an overhaul of the admin system, do it right. Build and organize a collection of user stories and mental models; email isn't an adequate organization. Use empirical data, including a cardsort survey if that's right, but ideally including observation in context. Anecdotal feedback can identify the big issues, but generally doesn't create a complete picture of the usability issues. Sorry if this sounds like it's coming from left field. I get frustrated when I see the same people who insist upon hard, reliable data for things like database optimizations and use rigorous models for code design, then turn around and approach usability through force of personality. Gary