On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 23:59 +0200, Dries Buytaert wrote:
On 22 Jun 2006, at 21:38, Bèr Kessels wrote:
In the link above, he already answers that question: "This module can provide a lightweight solution to taxonomy_theme.module or sections.module if you only want to switch to a single different theme based on URL paths."
I read that. Still I see no difference. Sections is very small. The amount of code in both modules is not much different.
Don't get me wrong: I am all for choice. But two modules that do almost exactly the same, in almost exactly the same way, with almost the exact same code are IMO a waste of time.
Is that why you forked core's upload.module ? ;-)
No that would be stubborn, and core's upload.module being a pita. :) Same reason I started rewriting the file handling from the ground up. I can't think of a graceful upgrade path. I can think of a migration path to something new though. RFC: http://darrelopry.com/docs/filesystem