So you would like to push an interim solution down into the throat of the community [etc.]
No one, I hope, is talking about pushing anything down anyone's throat. In this and other discussions, I've done my best to present proposals for change in a direct, constructive, and respectful way. It's about how we work together on a common goal. There are risks to putting thresholds too low, and I agree wholeheartedly with the concerns expressed. By just the same token, there are important risks to gatekeeping: presenting excessively high barriers to contribution. Either extreme threatens the quality of our project. My view of the record suggests we sometimes tend to the gatekeeping extreme. We could take some ameliorative steps, strike a more productive balance. I can't make the case any better than I have. "Drupal encourages users and developers to identify issues, welcomes innovative solutions from new and established contributors, and moves quickly to adopt high quality patches." That's what I'm aiming for. And I feel from comments that it's a widely shared goal.