22 Apr
2005
22 Apr
'05
7:18 p.m.
On 22 Apr 2005, at 11:20, Adrian Rossouw wrote:
Since flexinode is a very usefull and popular module, I don't think it is a problem to depend on it. I think it's a big problem to depend on it. Flexinode is incredibly complex for what we are trying to do. Most of the sites we develop don't use flexinode, and until some form of node caching is in core, I don't believe we should depend on it for functionality like that.
I'm skeptic as well. A dedicated node type sounds a lot easier to work with (but has its limitations). How is this going to work in terms of the CCK? Is there going to be an 'event field' which you can extend node types with? -- Dries Buytaert :: http://www.buytaert.net/