I agree, gallery is not really core material, but uploading images and using them on various pages is. To use them they need to be browsable by various mechanisms, e.g. owned by current user or taxonomy. Images need copyright restrictions, e.g. by user, public domain, creative commons, that get assigned at upload time.
-----Original Message----- From: development-bounces@drupal.org [mailto:development-bounces@drupal.org] On Behalf Of Earl Miles Sent: Sunday, April 02, 2006 4:37 PM To: development@drupal.org; jeff@viapositiva.net Subject: Re: [development] nodeapi image concept (request for feedback)
At the same time I would also separate out the gallery portion of the code; perhaps making it a separate module (image.module + image_gallery.module) which would allow alternative galleries (shazamgallery for example) to have more freedom without worrying about the default image gallery stuff. Taxonomy is not always appropriate for galleries.
Jeff Eaton wrote:
I think it's exactly what a lot of people have been asking for in image.module for a long time -- definitely more useful for the majority of people than the gallery function. Like uploading, it can be turned off on a nodetype by nodetype basis, so nothing is *forced* on users, neh?
I'm curious whether it could be used by a module I'm working on -- a 'graphic novel' nodetype that would have 2 explicitly named images associated with it (one for the left page and one for the right page of a two-page spread).
--Jeff
-----Original Message----- *From:* James Gilliland [mailto:neclimdul@gmail.com] *Sent:* Sunday, April 02, 2006 12:36 PM *To:* development@drupal.org *Subject:* Re: [development] nodeapi image concept (request for feedback)
I'd like to see it there
On 4/2/06, *James Walker* <walkah@walkah.net <mailto:walkah@walkah.net>> wrote:
On 31-Mar-06, at 5:25 PM, Nedjo Rogers wrote:
> There's an issue on the image module for moving to nodeapi: > > http://drupal.org/node/43628
Yeah, after looking through the code, I'm inclined to say this makes sense directly in image.module . Do others have a strong opinion?
-- James Walker :: http://walkah.net/ :: xmpp:walkah@walkah.net <mailto:xmpp:walkah@walkah.net>