Op 22-mrt-05 om 10:05 heeft Tim Altman het volgende geschreven:
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 09:12:21 +0100, Stefan Nagtegaal <Drupal-Devel@iStyledThis.nl> wrote:
Op 22-mrt-05 om 8:49 heeft Tim Altman het volgende geschreven:
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 22:49:54 +0100, Stefan Nagtegaal <Drupal-Devel@iStyledThis.nl> wrote:
Op 21-mrt-05 om 22:25 heeft drupal-devel@drupal.org het volgende geschreven:
User: dries Branch: HEAD Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 21:25:49 +0000
Modified files: /modules system.module
Log message: - Patch #18093 by Junyor: clean up handling of image toolkit code in absence of any toolkits.
[...]
This is not uniform/consistent to the other code we currently have.
[...]
When there is no image toolkit available, why would you want to see the option to select all this?? We do not do that anywhere in drupal, only with the "Clean url"-option..
I understand where you're coming from, but try to think like a user or documentor. Vanishing options and making people look all over the place for information is not good UI and very hard to document.
-- Tim Altman IMO it's not at hard at all.. When we keep on the approach that all notices and server apgrade possibilities goes into WATCHDOG_NOTICE there _is_ a central place to look into to get a maximum usable drupal.. One glance at the 'notices'-page of the watchdog will give you everything you need to see what could be done to accomplish the goal of something you want to be able of..
That is - imo - better than struggling through all the settings pages and see why such a function doesn't work.. Stefan