On Sat, 04 Mar 2006 11:13:57 +0100, Derek Wright <derek@dwwright.net> wrote:
On Fri, 3 Mar 2006 21:45:40 -0800 Jason Flatt wrote:
I think as long as users have the ability to file critical bugs, no matter how you define them, you will always have invalid critical bugs. Maybe by defining what qualifies as a critical bug, you'll have fewer invalid critical bugs, but some people just plain think their problems, no matter how insignificant they are in the grand scheme of things, are more important than anyone else's.
true. however, better guidelines can only help minimize the invalid critical issues, and even a slight reduction in the overall number would be a big payoff long term.
My definition: -- When a bug breaks all core. For example sessions, bootstrap one of the form elements or something like that. -- A whole (or most of a) module is unusable. Example: you can't post a forum topic. -- Major part of a module is broken. Example: you can't add a menu with menu module. Regards NK