On Fri, 22 Dec 2006, [utf-8] Bèr Kessels wrote:
Drupal has a good history of not stepping into that trap. Drupal has not been afraid to break old code and concepts. Yet in this very case page and story were allowed to co-exist, without any clear reason. FRom 4.6 to 4.7 and now from 4.7 to 5.0
Ber the clear reason was that you can attach different permissions to them, different taxonomy vocabularies, different publishing defaults, display of 'submitted by' information, enabling of comments, etc. These are all still utilized features and differentiators of actual usage patterns of story and page (with these usage patterns differring from website to website for good reasons). The possibilties can be better communicated, and better defaults can be made for the two types, but saying that there is no reason to have the two of them is false IMHO. Gabor