Quoting Ivan Sergio Borgonovo <mail@webthatworks.it>:
I think it is in the right of drupal infrastructure team to impose minimum requirement so that your module is hosted and advertised on drupal infrastructure and associated with drupal project.
Nope. Drupal and therefore its contributed modules uses the GPL license which guarantees that I can do what ever with it including hosting it else where.
drupal project is free to impose or not impose any rule.
Not if the rule violates the license.
They do... and you'll have less developed modules. They don't... and the the quality of modules will be lower. All this reflects on the image and technical merits of drupal project as a whole.
Maybe. Or perhaps it would less favorless on the project if Drupal decided not to host contributed modules at all. There is a learning curve and there are suggested procedures with the contributed module conventions. Enforcing them is a community effort and if you find a module that doesn't align with the suggested procedures you can open an issue with the project.
It doesn't look scandalous.
Yes it does because what you propose violates the license. Earnie -- http://for-my-kids.com/ -- http://give-me-an-offer.com/